Early Memories

My body was born 50 years ago. I know this not only because my parents told me, but also because the government decided its business includes tracking and certifying exactly when, where, and of whom people are born.

My body bears the scars and wear of 50 years of life. The first half of that period it was growing. Then it stopped growing and started down a predictable path of degeneration. (Presbyopia appeared within the last decade, followed by the beginnings of detectable osteoarthritis.)

My mind also bears the scars and wear of 50 years of life. I can trace paths backward in time, but my ability to do that is also only going to degrade as it ages. My memory (like that of most people) is not continuous. I have snapshots of varying length, clarity, and detail. Looking back in time is like turning around and finding most of the path you walked submerged in a dark body of water. The memory snapshots are like stepping stones that have not yet sunk from view.

How far back can I see?

My earliest memory is from just before I reached my second birthday. What I remember is looking out a window where we lived and seeing a snowplow a few houses up the street that was stuck. I was upset and wanted the truck to get help. I was placated when my father said he would go help it. (How can I be confident in this memory? The visual details in my mind are limited, but I am certain I was looking downwards and to the left and the plow was 3-4 houses up the street heading away. Cross-checking with my parents: at the time we lived on the second story of a house that had windows tall enough for a 2-year-old to see out. My father remembers the incident and agrees with the orientation and distance of the plow. Public records note two extreme blizzards in the month before my second birthday.)

Memories that I would call visually “complete” begin by age 4, which I can tell because they occurred around a house we left in my fifth year. Here are some of the more vivid ones:

Rattlesnake in the street: I was playing outside and my Mom ushered me into the house saying there was a rattlesnake and it was dangerous. I watched from a window as my Dad and five other men from the neighborhood formed a loose circle around it, right in the middle of the street. They were armed with shovels and I could see a few take jabs at the snake, but otherwise they were just hanging out, talking. I was a little confused because my Mom had made it seem like a serious threat, but it looked like the men were treating it as more of a social gathering. I finally got bored of watching so don’t know how that ended.

Want to learn violin? My Mom was lying on a bed reading a book. Out of the blue, she looked up and asked me if I wanted to take violin lessons. (What is a 4-year-old in the pre-computer-game era going to say: “No, I have too many other commitments?” Of course I’d like to try a new activity!)

You only get soda if you can do it right: A local kid had a 2-liter bottle of soda. He offered to share it with anyone who could drink without backwashing. I don’t remember the words he used to explain it, but basically if you could pour or sip without putting the whole opening in your mouth, you could drink; if not you only got to watch. He demonstrated, and then invited others to drink. I was so relieved when my lips proved coordinated enough to get soda. I felt bad for another boy failed and was denied.

What are men good for?

Further On the Primacy of Women: Across the mammal class, adult females are capable of raising and providing for children without the assistance of males. Males are fundamentally only sperm donors. Furthermore, given the cost among higher mammals of bearing and raising children, fertile females are a limiting resource. And these circumstances lead almost inevitably to a terrible selective cycle for male violence: Males that can dominate fertile females are the ones whose genes survive. Sure enough, across primates we find males evolved to control reproductive access to females and kill competing males. Read these really great essays on the topic:

On the Primacy of Women

The Judeo-Christian story of the creation of humans in Genesis 2:18 is quaintly androcentric, describing the female sex as a supplemental creation to the male sex. The Hebrew description of the purpose of woman, עֵזֶר כְּנֶגְדּֽוֹ – most reasonably translated as counterpart – is often given an even more chauvinistic translation to describe woman as a helper or companion for man.

The androcentric perspective has continued into the modern era with women struggling to establish all sorts of equality with men. This is utterly bizarre when considered in the context of our species and its survival: It is males who are the adjunctive gender. The only essential role that men play in the survival of the human species is to supply sperm to fertile females. Everything else that men do is secondary to the essential and consuming labor of mothers.

Human females have a heavy reproductive burden: We are bipedal mammals with upright backs. This makes carrying a fetus awkward and delivering a baby often debilitating and even lethal. Human babies are altricial and have a longer period of dependence than any other animal.1 We have hungry, enormous brains but relatively weak digestive systems. Mankind exists because women have the capacity to balance and serve the onerous task of bearing and rearing children to maturity.2

It is males that are relegated to a supporting role in the human life cycle. Human males have virtually no reproductive burden – if men did nothing but make a momentary seminal deposit and then disappear humans would be fine. Another way to look at this is in terms of male biological freedom, and it’s interesting to see how that freedom is exploited. In phenotypic terms, human males can afford to display a greater variance of every measurable trait. While this leads to more apparently pathological behavior, it also leads to extremes of constructive traits that have fostered the development of human innovation and the proliferation of civilization.3


1 Interestingly: the time it takes an species’ young to mature is strongly correlated with the number of cortical neurons in its brain. Humans have far more cortical neurons than any other animal.

2 A few weeks after posting this I found this book review of Mom Genes, which details the remarkable neuro-physiological transformation that occurs in women who become mothers.

3 Is There Anything Good About Men? is a book I later found that appears to delve into this in more detail. I found an earlier paper by the author bearing the same title that is a really fascinating and worthwhile read.

Bubbles

This post is not a reference to current stock markets or the throngs of new retail traders chasing extraordinary profits. Not at all. This is just some of my favorite pictures of one of my boys and his fascination and delight with bubbles.